Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> D'oh! That's what I get for doing a half-hack job. Dammit. I'll go
> fix that. Well, OK, I'll go yank 'em, as this is a very good point:
These c?mod opcodes are history. I've deleted them
ops.num is updated.
leo
At 9:48 PM +0100 2/12/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A few more mod ops
+=item B(out PMC, in INT, in INT)
I'm not sure if this is a good idea. We currently don't have any such
kind of ops that takes 2 natural types and spits out a new PMC
Yeah, good point.
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A few more mod ops
> +=item B(out PMC, in INT, in INT)
I'm not sure if this is a good idea. We currently don't have any such
kind of ops that takes 2 natural types and spits out a new PMC
BTW, the doc above has out PMC, the implementation is:
> +o
