At 02:06 PM 8/25/00 -0400, Uri Guttman wrote:
>i like that. but is that only platform implementation specific? i see a
>possibility of requesting (via a pragma) an alternative implementation of
>binary (see i used the new term!).
I'd like to get overridable opcode functions and function functions
i cc'ed to language as this issue spans then as well as internals.
> "LW" == Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
LW> We're fighting multiple definitions of "core" here. Please distinguish
LW> the core of the language from the core of the implementation--they're
LW> two entirely di
