Re: [Fwd: call opcodes cleanup]

2005-08-10 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 04:32:27PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > [ /me warnock fighting - and update below for method calls ] Just to register an opinion -- I don't think the proposed changes cause me any grief, so they're fine with me. Pm

Re: [Fwd: call opcodes cleanup]

2005-08-10 Thread Matt Fowles
Leo~ On 8/10/05, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [ /me warnock fighting - and update below for method calls ] > > Original Message ---- > Subject: call opcodes cleanup > Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 09:52:07 +0200 > From: Leopold Toetsch <[EMA

[Fwd: call opcodes cleanup]

2005-08-10 Thread Leopold Toetsch
[ /me warnock fighting - and update below for method calls ] Original Message Subject: call opcodes cleanup Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 09:52:07 +0200 From: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Perl 6 Internals There are still some leftovers of the old calling scheme,

call opcodes cleanup

2005-07-21 Thread Leopold Toetsch
There are still some leftovers of the old calling scheme, which I'd like to get rid of (1,2) or change slightly (3): 1) bare invoke This opcode assumes P0 = Sub, P1 = Continuation 2) bare invokecc This opcode assumes P0 = Sub 3) invoke Px This opcode assumes P1 = Continuation, but it has a