Michal Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's a new test case for t/pmc/sub.t
>
> output_is(<<'CODE', <<'OUTPUT', "set_eh - throw - clear_eh");
> print "start\n"
> newsub P20, .Exception_Handler, _handler
> set_eh P20
> new P30, .Exception
> throw P30
> prin
Here's a new test case for t/pmc/sub.t
output_is(<<'CODE', <<'OUTPUT', "set_eh - throw - clear_eh");
print "start\n"
newsub P20, .Exception_Handler, _handler
set_eh P20
new P30, .Exception
throw P30
print "not reached\n"
end
_handler:
clear_eh
print "
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> No, the exception object isn't around anymore in the handler, so you
> don't C there.
>
> This could of course be just my wrong implementation.
No, it makes sense. You wouldn't want an exception in
the catch: block to trigger an infinite loop.
But i
