> Clark
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 12:28 PM
> To: Jarkko Hietaniemi
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: aix - cc_r vs xlc_r
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 10:23:34PM +0200, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> > Nicholas Clark
Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 10:23:34PM +0200, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
>
>>Nicholas Clark wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On AIX, what's the difference between cc_r and xlc_r?
>>
>>See /etc/xlc.cfg.
>>
>>I vaguely remember that's it's the cc_r that's guaranteed (well, *more*
>>guaranteed) to
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 10:23:34PM +0200, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> Nicholas Clark wrote:
>
> > On AIX, what's the difference between cc_r and xlc_r?
>
> See /etc/xlc.cfg.
>
> I vaguely remember that's it's the cc_r that's guaranteed (well, *more*
> guaranteed) to be there, if there's any compi
Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On AIX, what's the difference between cc_r and xlc_r?
See /etc/xlc.cfg.
I vaguely remember that's it's the cc_r that's guaranteed (well, *more*
guaranteed) to be there, if there's any compiler with reentrant
libraries.
> And why does parrot's hints file go for xlc_r, whe
On AIX, what's the difference between cc_r and xlc_r?
And why does parrot's hints file go for xlc_r, whereas perl5's goes for cc_r?
This is causing pain for ponie. Is there any reason not to pick the same one
for both?
[yes, 3-way cross post, but I think it's justified]
Nicholas Clark
