Re: __init vs. __init_pmc

2007-01-25 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Am Donnerstag, 25. Januar 2007 06:23 schrieb Matt Diephouse: > > This change is just adding more mess to object construction and argument > > passing. > > > > I've made several attempts to unify object construction with new calling > > convs > > but no one seems to be listening :-( > > That was a c

Re: __init vs. __init_pmc

2007-01-24 Thread Matt Diephouse
Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, some changes not too long before the release did break pg.t. I was now able to track it down: now the object constructor: $I0 = find_type ['Pg';'Conn'] o_con = new $I0, con does _not_ call .sub init :vtable :method anymore it's c

__init vs. __init_pmc

2007-01-24 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Hi, some changes not too long before the release did break pg.t. I was now able to track it down: now the object constructor: $I0 = find_type ['Pg';'Conn'] o_con = new $I0, con does _not_ call .sub init :vtable :method anymore it's calling init_pmc instead. This change is just