I think nightly builds are great, especially considering that most people
don't have a Haskell environment set up. Keep the builds coming! Especially
ones with parrot and perl5 integration :-)
(Yes, I'm lazy)
Rutger
On Fri, 19 May 2006 12:33:56 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 20
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 01:24:57PM -0400, James Peregrino wrote:
> At this stage, are binaries even worth it? Judging from my lurking
> on #perl6, things are moving so fast that anything but a regular
> nightly-built binary would be too out of date. Seems like svn is
> the way to go.
Binarie
True. Although, I would say that for those who only want to tinker
with the language, this might be the most convenient way to do so. I
have already started to work with it and I am liking what I am seeing.
On 5/19/06, James Peregrino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At this stage, are binaries even
At this stage, are binaries even worth it? Judging from my lurking
on #perl6, things are moving so fast that anything but a regular
nightly-built binary would be too out of date. Seems like svn is
the way to go.
-James
At 11:58 AM -0400 5/19/06, Chris Yocum wrote:
Hi All,
I just want
Hi All,
I just wanted to let you know that there are some Windows
binaries of Pugs avaliable from Jonathan Worthington
(http://www.jwcs.net/~jonathan/perl6/). They seem to be a bit out of
date (last update was at Monday, 10-Apr-2006 05:29:30 CDT) but should
get you started.
Regards,
Chris
