In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(James Mastros) wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 01:38:58PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > Currently, I don't want to promise back before Win98, though if Win95
> > is no different from a programming standpoint (I have no idea if it
> > is) the
At 06:27 PM 11/4/2001 -0500, James Mastros wrote:
>On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 01:38:58PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > Currently, I don't want to promise back before Win98, though if Win95
> is no
> > different from a programming standpoint (I have no idea if it is) then
> > that's fine too. Win 3.
On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 01:38:58PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Currently, I don't want to promise back before Win98, though if Win95 is no
> different from a programming standpoint (I have no idea if it is) then
> that's fine too. Win 3.1 and DOS are *not* target platforms, though if
> someone
At 05:26 PM 11/4/2001 +, Richard J Cox wrote:
>This of course leads to the question of what is the earliest Win32 version
>that Perl6 will support?
Currently, I don't want to promise back before Win98, though if Win95 is no
different from a programming standpoint (I have no idea if it is) th
Currently for a Win32 build WINVER is not being set, this leads to it
being set in Windef.h (included by Windows.h) to 0x0500, or "build for
Windows 2000".
This is OK, until (for whatever) reason a Win2k only API is called, at
which point the built exe will not run on earlier versions of Windo
