Juergen Boemmels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Only a few fixes in imcc are needed to compile warning-free, most of
> them are unused parameters and variables.
Applied. Thanks,
> bye
> b=F6
leo
Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the spirit of this, I attach a couple of patches that clear up some of
> the many warnings on Win32.
Thanks, applied.
> Jonathan
leo
> A clean running make not cluttered with tons of warnings gives a more
> confidental feeling for the quality of the project and just looks
> better.
In the spirit of this, I attach a couple of patches that clear up some of
the many warnings on Win32. One of them is the long standing problem of
mi
Juergen Boemmels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know IMCC is under heavy development right now so I will not comit
> these fixes but only send them to the list as a suggestion.
Nethertheless I'd suggest to apply such patches[1] immediately[2]. It
could cause small rediffs[3] for people working on
Hi,
from time to time i do a little warning patrol in parrot and configure
with --ccwarn=-Werror.
Only a few fixes in imcc are needed to compile warning-free, most of
them are unused parameters and variables.
I know IMCC is under heavy development right now so I will not comit
these fixes but
