At 6:23 PM -0300 5/20/02, Daniel Grunblatt wrote:
>On Mon, 20 May 2002, David M. Lloyd wrote:
>
>> What about subroutines? Are bsr & jsr the way it's gonna be or is there
>> a rework in the works?
>
>docs/pdds/pdd03_calling_conventions.pod :)
Ans I think I need to get that tidied up soon, as t
On Mon, 20 May 2002, Daniel Grunblatt wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 May 2002, David M. Lloyd wrote:
>
> > What about subroutines? Are bsr & jsr the way it's gonna be or is there
> > a rework in the works?
>
> docs/pdds/pdd03_calling_conventions.pod :)
OK, I've looked it over but it doesn't say "Subrout
On Mon, 20 May 2002, David M. Lloyd wrote:
> What about subroutines? Are bsr & jsr the way it's gonna be or is there
> a rework in the works?
docs/pdds/pdd03_calling_conventions.pod :)
On Mon, 20 May 2002, David M. Lloyd wrote:
> Has anyone given any thought to this problem yet?
>
> Will we be able to do this or do we need a special vtable whose entries
> automatically do a callback to Parrot?
For that matter, what about calling C functions from Parrot? Loading PMCs
dynamical
Has anyone given any thought to this problem yet?
Will we be able to do this or do we need a special vtable whose entries
automatically do a callback to Parrot?
- D
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
