On Tuesday 11 December 2007 03:58:38 Andy Armstrong wrote:
> It'd be interesting to get all these folk who are working on VMs
> around a table to chat about their respective rationales.
That may happen in early February. It did happen for a bit at Foo Camp this
summer.
> Or perhaps somebody co
On 11 Dec 2007, at 17:28, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
"Andy" == Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andy> Or perhaps somebody could podcast an interview with them? :)
Perhaps you were joking, but I noted that as a potential show for
FLOSS
Weekly. Thanks for the idea.
Not joking jus
> "Andy" == Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andy> Or perhaps somebody could podcast an interview with them? :)
Perhaps you were joking, but I noted that as a potential show for FLOSS
Weekly. Thanks for the idea.
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 5
On 11 Dec 2007, at 04:57, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
"Andy" == Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andy> Rubinus (new Ruby runtime)
Andy> http://www.infoq.com/news/2007/12/engine-yard-bets-big-rubinius
I'm trying to figure out why Rubinous is building a squeak-like vm
when squeak already
> "Andy" == Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andy> Rubinus (new Ruby runtime)
Andy> http://www.infoq.com/news/2007/12/engine-yard-bets-big-rubinius
I'm trying to figure out why Rubinous is building a squeak-like vm
when squeak already has a vm. They would have been done faster had
Rubinus (new Ruby runtime)
http://www.infoq.com/news/2007/12/engine-yard-bets-big-rubinius
C--: a portable assembly language that supports garbage collection
http://research.microsoft.com/~simonpj/Papers/c--/c--gc.htm
Everybody's at it :)
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
