At 6:59 PM + 2/10/02, Nicholas Clark wrote:
>On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 12:08:27PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>> The one downside to having continuations is it makes optimizing away
>> variables, even temp ones, a little tough--on switch to any code that
>> might create a continuation we need
On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 12:08:27PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> The one downside to having continuations is it makes optimizing away
> variables, even temp ones, a little tough--on switch to any code that
> might create a continuation we need to flush out from registers to a
> holding area, and
At 1:37 AM +0200 2/9/02, raptor wrote:
>I was just reading this :
>
>http://www.javalobby.com/clr.html
>
>and a question raised to me. Will Parrot have some optimisation
>(features) that will speed up closures & continuation ?
Closures are a very fundamental thing in perl, and they've got to be
raptor writes:
: I was just reading this :
:
: http://www.javalobby.com/clr.html
:
: and a question raised to me. Will Parrot have some optimisation
: (features) that will speed up closures & continuation ?
Well, we understand closures pretty well already, since Perl 5 has
'em. Most of the opt
oops i forgot can u comment this page from the perspective of Parrot-VM,
i.e. where we are better,worse compared to JVM & CLR.
> I was just reading this :
>
> http://www.javalobby.com/clr.html
>
> and a question raised to me. Will Parrot have some optimisation
> (features) that will speed up cl
I was just reading this :
http://www.javalobby.com/clr.html
and a question raised to me. Will Parrot have some optimisation
(features) that will speed up closures & continuation ?
raptor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
