Re: Time to change the (perl 6) guard! [OT]

2004-07-07 Thread Paul Hodges
--- Austin Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > . . . . > Of the qualities you listed for Pumpking: > > "Look, I already told you! I deal with the goddamn customers so the > engineers don't have to! I have people skills! I am good at dealing > with people! Can't you understand that? What the hell

Re: Time to change the (perl 6) guard!

2004-07-06 Thread Austin Hastings
--- Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 6:21 AM -0700 7/6/04, Austin Hastings wrote: > >--- Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> we need a Perl 6 pumpking, > > > >Luke Palmer. > > No fair volunteering other people, Don't think of it as "volunteering other people" so much as "pop

Re: Time to change the (perl 6) guard!

2004-07-06 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 6:21 AM -0700 7/6/04, Austin Hastings wrote: --- Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: we need a Perl 6 pumpking, Luke Palmer. No fair volunteering other people, though I'd be happy to forward *your* volunteering on to Allison... :-P -- Dan --it's lik

Re: Time to change the (perl 6) guard!

2004-07-06 Thread Austin Hastings
--- Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > we need a Perl 6 pumpking, Luke Palmer.

Time to change the (perl 6) guard!

2004-07-06 Thread Dan Sugalski
Or at least lay on more. Here's the scoop--we need a Perl 6 pumpking, someone to take on the responsibility of making the Perl 6 compiler happen. When we started this whole process these many years ago, we though having one person handle the software end of things was sufficient, but making perl 6