On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 11:48:27PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 08:57:02PM -0500, Bryan C . Warnock wrote:
> > Particularly after this:
> >
> > http://news.cnet.com/investor/news/newsitem/0-9900-1028-4825719-RHAT.html?tag=ltnc
>
> "Innovation-- you keep using this wo
>
http://news.cnet.com/investor/news/newsitem/0-9900-1028-4825719-RHAT.html?t
> ag=ltnc
I wish I could think of something commensurate to say. I don't think I've
ever seen this much cockamamey horseradish on a single sheet of
cyberpaper. The most absurd part of it is that the bastages actually
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 08:57:02PM -0500, Bryan C . Warnock wrote:
> Particularly after this:
>
> http://news.cnet.com/investor/news/newsitem/0-9900-1028-4825719-RHAT.html?tag=ltnc
"Innovation-- you keep using this word, I do not think it means what
you think it means."
On Tuesday 13 February 2001 21:32, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> David L. Nicol writes:
> > Is there a budget? Apprenticeship makes all kinds of sense when
> > there is actually a money flow into the guild; the carrot of eventual
> > credentials is too weak for me and many lesser poetasters.
> >
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 10:11:33AM -0800, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the magic address;
>
> -digest has a specific meaning with many mailing list managers. I
> would suggest calling it perl6-summaries or such to avoid confusion.
Yuh, I thought of that the second after tell
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Simon Cozens wrote:
[...]
> To you, and to everyone else who has asked, yes. I'm working on setting
> up a list right now, hosted at netthink. It's currently subscribable, but
> there are some teething problems with posting. (Which needn't concern you,
> except that if you s
On Sun, 11 Feb 2001 22:44:38 +, Simon Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was being serious. But first, a plea:
>
> This is much harder than doing the Perl 5 summaries, because I have to
> watch over a lot more things. I'd appreciate some help; if you feel this
> is a useful exercise and yo
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 04:46:08PM +0100, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> Would it be possible to make this summary subsribable, so I can drop my
> subscribtions to p6-internal?
To you, and to everyone else who has asked, yes. I'm working on setting
up a list right now, hosted at netthink. It's currently
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Simon Cozens wrote:
[...]
> If you think it would be ethical and correct for the assistants to draw
> a salary while the editor does not, please go ahead and push O'Reilly
> for money.
I want a cent per mail delivered from the perl mailinglists![1] Who
want's to pay?
(In o
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 07:32:46PM -0700, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> David L. Nicol writes:
> > Is there a budget? Apprenticeship makes all kinds of sense when
> > there is actually a money flow into the guild; the carrot of eventual
> > credentials is too weak for me and many lesser poetasters.
David L. Nicol writes:
> Is there a budget? Apprenticeship makes all kinds of sense when
> there is actually a money flow into the guild; the carrot of eventual
> credentials is too weak for me and many lesser poetasters.
>
> Could O'Reilly and Microsoft divert some funds to actually paying pe
"Bryan C. Warnock" wrote:
>
> [1] See the massive thread starting at
> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00584.html
Is there a budget? Apprenticeship makes all kinds of sense when
there is actually a money flow into the guild; the carrot of eventual
credentials is too weak for me and many lesser poeta
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 11:26:54AM -0500, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
> It also sounds like a good task for the PAWBs[1] - perhaps as contributors
> while you handle the editing?
Very good thinking! I've already had a couple of volunteers (Thanks guys!)
so to save me sending out the same mail over a
Simon:
> This is much harder than doing the Perl 5 summaries, because I have to
> watch over a lot more things. I'd appreciate some help; if you feel this
> is a useful exercise and you can spare about an hour a week, please get
> in touch with me and I'll tell you how you can help me. Alternative
I was being serious. But first, a plea:
This is much harder than doing the Perl 5 summaries, because I have to
watch over a lot more things. I'd appreciate some help; if you feel this
is a useful exercise and you can spare about an hour a week, please get
in touch with me and I'll tell you how yo
15 matches
Mail list logo
