RE: Things we need to do.

2001-09-14 Thread Brent Dax
Simon Cozens: # Yeah, that was it! Brent, do you want to take care of that. # (config_h.in would be better, since it gets mindshare from the # current Perl 5 build process.) Didn't take long--patch below sig. You'll also have to rename config.h.in to config_h.in yourself. --Brent Dax [EMAIL PRO

RE: Things we need to do.

2001-09-14 Thread Brent Dax
4, 2001 01:41 # To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # Subject: Re: Things we need to do. # # # On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 09:48:27PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: # > Ah, I'm sure it was a slip 'o the keyboard. :) config.h_in # (or config_h.in) # > are both OK, and unique enough on 8.3 systems. # # Yeah,

Re: Things we need to do.

2001-09-14 Thread Simon Cozens
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 09:48:27PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: > Ah, I'm sure it was a slip 'o the keyboard. :) config.h_in (or config_h.in) > are both OK, and unique enough on 8.3 systems. Yeah, that was it! Brent, do you want to take care of that. (config_h.in would be better, since it gets min

Re: Things we need to do.

2001-09-14 Thread Simon Cozens
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 06:35:39PM -0700, Brent Dax wrote: > Ask Simon, he's the one who came up with 'config.h.in' in the first > place. Oops. Naughty me. I always fancied doing things like "config.hh" for .h file templates, but then C++ people might get confused.

RE: Things we need to do.

2001-09-13 Thread Brent Dax
Brent Dax: # Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 14:17 # To: Simon Cozens; [EMAIL PROTECTED] # Subject: RE: Things we need to do. # # # Simon Cozens: # # 2) Extend the Configure.pl system to autogenerate the # #Makefile as well. Use Makefile.in as a template, and # #fill in

Things we need to do.

2001-09-13 Thread Simon Cozens
If you're looking for something to do, we *always* have good little jobs for people. :) 1) See if there's a neat way of making the assembler grok shortened forms of ops: add I1, I2, I3 => add_i I1, I2, I3 print S1 => print_s S1 2) Extend the Configure.pl syste