> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DS> At 03:34 AM 11/15/00 +, David Grove wrote:
>> I'm on announce, I believe... I didn't get anything. (Internals seems like
>> a poor place to make than announcement.) How do I check to see that ezmlm
>> hasn't unsubscribed me from annou
At 03:34 AM 11/15/00 +, David Grove wrote:
>I'm on announce, I believe... I didn't get anything. (Internals seems like
>a poor place to make than announcement.) How do I check to see that ezmlm
>hasn't unsubscribed me from announce when my server was down last week for
>a couple of days? It's
I'm on announce, I believe... I didn't get anything. (Internals seems like
a poor place to make than announcement.) How do I check to see that ezmlm
hasn't unsubscribed me from announce when my server was down last week for
a couple of days? It's read-only, so I can't test-post to it, and I'm not
On 14 Nov 2000, Chaim Frenkel wrote:
> Did I miss something? I didn't see any discussion. Was this off-line?
No, on perl6-announce and perl6-internals.
Cheers,
Philip
--
Philip Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 12:58:25PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> (Though I don't think we really need more than a few weeks to get a good
> set of working RFCs for this, though of course they'll get amended and
> expanded as work proceeds)
I'd like to see a revised set of RFC guidelines specific
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, David Grove wrote:
> I'm very surprised to see planning groups for api and parsing for perl6
> springing up, with goals of providing RFC's in nine days.
The "deadlines" has never been a implicit mark where work would have
to stop, but just a date for when the chair (or whoe
Ok, so I'm not off in la-la land. See you in parser. I have a couple
things you might like...
Thanks, Dan
pete
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 12:17 AM 11/14/00 +, David Grove wrote:
> >Dan & al.,
> >
> >I'm very surprised to see planning groups for api and parsing for
per
At 12:17 AM 11/14/00 +, David Grove wrote:
>Dan & al.,
>
>I'm very surprised to see planning groups for api and parsing for perl6
>springing up, with goals of providing RFC's in nine days. This is rather
>confusing given that Larry hasn't yet (that I'm aware of) determined what
>Perl6 will eve
Did I miss something? I didn't see any discussion. Was this off-line?
Where is this list of api groups?
> "DG" == David Grove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DG> Dan & al.,
DG> I'm very surprised to see planning groups for api and parsing for perl6
DG> springing up, with goals of providing RF
Dan & al.,
I'm very surprised to see planning groups for api and parsing for perl6
springing up, with goals of providing RFC's in nine days. This is rather
confusing given that Larry hasn't yet (that I'm aware of) determined what
Perl6 will even look like, what, if any, new keywords will be there
10 matches
Mail list logo
