* Shlomi Fish wrote:
>It's nice, but I recall that with the same input file, it did not catch some
>problems that the W3C Validator then yelled at. (I don't recall what file it
>was, sorry).
Yes, Tidy won't report many errors, in particular such errors that are
easy to fix or different in HTML/X
On Saturday 06 August 2005 13:41, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> * Gábor Szabó wrote:
> >Reading the blog of Geoff about the OSCON session
> >http://www.onlamp.com/pub/wlg/7523
> >I just remembered an open issue for me.
> >
> >How do you test if an HTML page is in one of the w3 standards ?
> >There is t
* Gábor Szabó wrote:
>Reading the blog of Geoff about the OSCON session
>http://www.onlamp.com/pub/wlg/7523
>I just remembered an open issue for me.
>
>How do you test if an HTML page is in one of the w3 standards ?
>There is the w3 validator online at http://validator.w3.org/ but I cannot use
>tha
Reading the blog of Geoff about the OSCON session
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/wlg/7523
I just remembered an open issue for me.
How do you test if an HTML page is in one of the w3 standards ?
There is the w3 validator online at http://validator.w3.org/ but I cannot use
that for my ongoing tests. I ne
