> Secondly, who do I need to convince to add the "make test" results for
PASSes too? ;-)
Perhaps Adam J. Foxson. He maintains "Test::Reporter", which makes it
very easy to submit testing results through the 'cpantest' binary.
His address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please include me on those, as I'm up
On 2003-07-19, Leon Brocard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been looking at the testers database (well, downloading the list
> via nntp.perl.org really) for Module::CPANTS recently.
>
> In the current version of Module::CPANTS I report the count of PASSes
> and FAILs for each distribut
Ok, I patch this for use the great yaml I found one the new site, but
there is missing info into the yaml file:
Can't you include os name and os version that can be found in all reports:
osname=solaris, osvers=2.8, archname=sun4-solaris
This is displayed in the old interface with all result, now
alian sent the following bits through the ether:
> The patch is already done. But if there is others apps that use that:
> http://testers.cpan.org/search?request=dist&dist=$name
> who is now:
> http://testers.cpan.org/show/$name
Done that: http://testers.cpan.org/search?request=dist&dist=Acme-Col
But some problems ...
We use in CPANPLUS old interface, old url to fetch reports about a dist.
So there is no longuer report from CPANPLUS testers since yesterday.
Which interface is this? We can probably fake it with a mod_rewrite
rule if you tell me the details.
The patch is already done. But if
alian sent the following bits through the ether:
> I just see that testers.cpan.org now use your interface. Cl. Faaast.
Indeed!
> But some problems ...
> We use in CPANPLUS old interface, old url to fetch reports about a dist.
> So there is no longuer report from CPANPLUS testers since yes
http://search.cpan.org/author/LBROCARD/CPAN-WWW-Testers/
http://testers.astray.com/
I just see that testers.cpan.org now use your interface. Cl. Faaast.
But some problems ...
We use in CPANPLUS old interface, old url to fetch reports about a dist.
So there is no longuer report from CPANPLUS t
Comments welcome, Leon
About order of v-string:
It would be good in details results that 1.18 would be first before 1.2.
Eg:
1.18 (2 PASSes)
97757 PASS sun4-solaris
97976 PASS i586-linux
1.17 (1 FAIL)
97620 FAIL sun4-solaris
1.16 (1 FAIL)
97484 FAIL sun4-solaris
in place of
1.3 (3 PASSes)
22
Thus, I think that my website is correct in sorting the version
numbers. 1.2 should be later than 1.18. I think your versioning system
is wrong ;-)
Ok as this is not *my* versioning system, I will explain.
I use CVS, and extract version from something like:
$VERSION = ('$Revision: 1.18 $ ' =~ /(\d+
Graham Barr sent the following bits through the ether:
> > http://testers.cpan.org/search?request=dist&dist=MIME-Lite-HTML
> > keeps on timing out, so I don't know what it does. Graham?
>
> I just added a new index to the database. It should be much quicker now.
Wow, that's like a 100x speedup.
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 17:20, Leon Brocard wrote:
> Graham Barr sent the following bits through the ether:
>
> > > http://testers.cpan.org/search?request=dist&dist=MIME-Lite-HTML
> > > keeps on timing out, so I don't know what it does. Graham?
> >
> > I just added a new index to the database. It s
* Leon Brocard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [13 Aug 2003 21:31]:
[...]
> Thus, I think that my website is correct in sorting the version
> numbers. 1.2 should be later than 1.18. I think your versioning system
> is wrong ;-)
Which is the correct response. Versions should be flaots.
> http://dellah.org/te
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 19:06, Leon Brocard wrote:
> Graham Barr sent the following bits through the ether:
>
> > > Now maybe I should ignore the version numbers and instead sort using
> > > the dates that the module was uploaded to CPAN, but that's external
> > > information, bah.
> >
> > That is
Tels sent the following bits through the ether:
> Hm, it generates fast, but wrong results :-)
Ooops, the summaries are wrong. Fixed.
Leon
--
Leon Brocard.http://www.astray.com/
scribot.http://www.scribot.com/
... For Sale: Slightly u
alian sent the following bits through the ether:
> About order of v-string:
> It would be good in details results that 1.18 would be first before 1.2.
You're looking at http://testers.astray.com/show/MIME-Lite-HTML.html.
I'm actually sorting using version.pm at the moment, as it seemed to
be the
Graham Barr sent the following bits through the ether:
> > Now maybe I should ignore the version numbers and instead sort using
> > the dates that the module was uploaded to CPAN, but that's external
> > information, bah.
>
> That is what search does because guessing at peoples versioning was to
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 12:30, Leon Brocard wrote:
> http://dellah.org/testers/MIME-Lite-HTML gets the version sorting
> wrong but "right". How do you sort, Iain?
>
> http://testers.cpan.org/search?request=dist&dist=MIME-Lite-HTML
> keeps on timing out, so I don't know what it does. Graham?
I just
On Monday, Aug 4, 2003, at 08:15 US/Pacific, Leon Brocard wrote:
alian sent the following bits through the ether:
But there is a serious problem with CPAN test database. There is like
100 000 reports in the CPAN db.
This is not a big problem. 100_000 reports is a very small database
and I still d
* Tels ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [05 Aug 2003 02:21]:
[...]
> > http://testers.astray.com/
[...]
> Hm, it generates fast, but wrong results :-)
> Math::BigInt:
> 1.63 (4 FAILs, 16 PASSes)
Those figures appear to be cumulative. I have no
idea if that is intentional or not.
Otherwise, all looks much
--- Tels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hm, it generates fast, but wrong results :-)
>
> Math::BigInt:
[snip]
I have to concur. From HTML::TokeParser::Simple results I conclude two things:
2.1 (3 PASSes)
92430 PASS sun4-solaris
92784 PASS MSWin32-x86-multi-thread
93059 PASS i586-linux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Monday 04 August 2003 17:15, Leon Brocard wrote:
> alian sent the following bits through the ether:
> > But there is a serious problem with CPAN test database. There is like
> > 100 000 reports in the CPAN db.
>
> This is not a big problem. 100_000 repo
On Monday, August 4, 2003, at 08:15 AM, Leon Brocard wrote:
This is not a big problem. 100_000 reports is a very small database
and I still don't know why the testers.cpan.org site is so slow. I got
annoyed about it and wrote my own as it wasn't open source. It is much
much faster.
http://search.
alian sent the following bits through the ether:
> But there is a serious problem with CPAN test database. There is like
> 100 000 reports in the CPAN db.
This is not a big problem. 100_000 reports is a very small database
and I still don't know why the testers.cpan.org site is so slow. I got
an
My point is that the CPAN Testers reports for fails have the output of
make test, eg:
http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/96865
... but passes don't:
http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/96886
This is inconsistent and we're throwing information away. I say put it
in all the tim
Abe Timmerman sent the following bits through the ether:
> Did I misunderstand?
My point is that the CPAN Testers reports for fails have the output of
make test, eg:
http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/96865
... but passes don't:
http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/96886
T
Op een zonnige zomerdag (Sunday 03 August 2003 10:42), schreef Leon Brocard:
> Leon Brocard sent the following bits through the ether:
> > Secondly, who do I need to convince to add the "make test" results for
> > PASSes too? ;-)
>
> So, does anyone actually have an opinion on this?
If you are ta
Leon Brocard wrote:
> Leon Brocard sent the following bits through the ether:
>
> > Secondly, who do I need to convince to add the "make test" results for
> > PASSes too? ;-)
>
> So, does anyone actually have an opinion on this?
*Puts up hand*. I agree with you. Seems useful and trivial to impleme
Leon Brocard sent the following bits through the ether:
> Secondly, who do I need to convince to add the "make test" results for
> PASSes too? ;-)
So, does anyone actually have an opinion on this?
Leon
--
Leon Brocard.http://www.astray.com/
scribot...
Hello,
I've been looking at the testers database (well, downloading the list
via nntp.perl.org really) for Module::CPANTS recently.
In the current version of Module::CPANTS I report the count of PASSes
and FAILs for each distribution. This works well.
I've been looking at gathering the number of
29 matches
Mail list logo
