Re: [perl #66742] AutoReply: make test failing on OS X

2009-06-19 Thread S F
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 8:57 AM, perl6 via RT wrote: > Greetings, > > This message has been automatically generated in response to the > creation of a trouble ticket regarding: > "make test failing on OS X", > a summary of which appears below. > > There i

[perl #66742] make test failing on OS X

2009-06-19 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by S F # Please include the string: [perl #66742] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=66742 > This morning I did: git pull perl Configure.PL --gen-parrot make clean make make test And make

[perl #61116] test failing in trunk

2008-12-07 Thread Andreas J. Koenig
# New Ticket Created by (Andreas J. Koenig) # Please include the string: [perl #61116] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61116 > --- osname= linux osvers= 2.6.18-6-xen-amd64 arch= x86_64-linux-gnu-thread-mult

Re: [perl #61116] AutoReply: test failing in trunk

2008-12-07 Thread Andreas J. Koenig
> On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 23:03:17 -0800, "Parrot via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: > t/op/callingNOK 73/98 git bisect blames https://svn.perl.org/parrot/[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- andreas

[perl #60068] [BUG] t/pmc/packfile.t: set_integer_keyed_str test failing on Darwin PPC

2008-11-24 Thread James Keenan via RT
Test continues to pass, so I'm resolving ticket.

[perl #60068] [BUG] t/pmc/packfile.t: set_integer_keyed_str test failing on Darwin PPC

2008-11-19 Thread James Keenan via RT
Tonight, for the first time in four weeks, this test (#6) passed on Darwin/PPC. Cf.: http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/tap_stream/8270/260 I can't really tell which commit fixed this failure. Given the fact that several files with 'pack' in their names were changed in r32888 (part

Re: [perl #60068] [BUG] t/pmc/packfile.t: set_integer_keyed_str test failing on Darwin PPC

2008-11-15 Thread Mark Glines
[oops, forgot to copy the list.] If darwin has gdb, you can do the following to get a backtrace: $ gdb parrot gdb> run t/pmc/packfile_6.pir [segfault should occur here] gdb> bt Mark

[perl #60068] [BUG] t/pmc/packfile.t: set_integer_keyed_str test failing on Darwin PPC

2008-11-15 Thread James Keenan via RT
On Sat Nov 08 00:06:50 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Can you post a backtrace? > Attached. backtrace.packfile_6.pir Description: Binary data

Re: [perl #60068] [BUG] t/pmc/packfile.t: set_integer_keyed_str test failing on Darwin PPC

2008-11-15 Thread Will Coleda
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:31 AM, James E Keenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > chromatic wrote: >> >> On Tuesday 28 October 2008 20:07:18 James Keenan via RT wrote: >> >>> Still failing as of r32225; cf >>> http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/tap_stream/7437/260 >>> >>> not ok 6 - set_i

Re: [perl #60068] [BUG] t/pmc/packfile.t: set_integer_keyed_str test failing on Darwin PPC

2008-11-15 Thread James E Keenan
chromatic wrote: On Tuesday 28 October 2008 20:07:18 James Keenan via RT wrote: Still failing as of r32225; cf http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/tap_stream/7437/260 not ok 6 - set_integer_keyed_str # Failed test 'set_integer_keyed_str' # at t/pmc/packfile.t line 140. # Exit

Re: [perl #60068] [BUG] t/pmc/packfile.t: set_integer_keyed_str test failing on Darwin PPC

2008-11-08 Thread chromatic
On Tuesday 28 October 2008 20:07:18 James Keenan via RT wrote: > Still failing as of r32225; cf > http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/tap_stream/7437/260 > > not ok 6 - set_integer_keyed_str > > # Failed test 'set_integer_keyed_str' > # at t/pmc/packfile.t line 140. > # Exited wit

[perl #60068] [BUG] t/pmc/packfile.t: set_integer_keyed_str test failing on Darwin PPC

2008-10-28 Thread James Keenan via RT
Still failing as of r32225; cf http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/tap_stream/7437/260 not ok 6 - set_integer_keyed_str # Failed test 'set_integer_keyed_str' # at t/pmc/packfile.t line 140. # Exited with error code: [SIGNAL 11] # Received: # # Expected: # not equal #

[perl #60068] [BUG] t/pmc/packfile.t: set_integer_keyed_str test failing on Darwin PPC

2008-10-22 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan # Please include the string: [perl #60068] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60068 > This is the only test failure I'm getting with version 0.8 on Darwin, PPC, OS X 10.4:

Re: [perl #37745] [BUG] PGE::P5Regexp test failing

2005-11-24 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 03:08:31PM -0800, jerry gay wrote: > # New Ticket Created by jerry gay > # Please include the string: [perl #37745] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37745 > > > > test 502 causes p

Re: [perl #37745] [BUG] PGE::P5Regexp test failing

2005-11-24 Thread Leopold Toetsch
jerry gay (via RT) wrote: test 502 causes parrot to eat all memory and use all cpu (on win32 anyway.) since i've added a special env var to support the running of a single test in this test file, it can be run in isolation like: set TEST_P5RX=502 prove t/compilers/pge/p5regexp/p5rx_1.pir b

[perl #37745] [BUG] PGE::P5Regexp test failing

2005-11-24 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by jerry gay # Please include the string: [perl #37745] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37745 > test 502 causes parrot to eat all memory and use all cpu (on win32 anyway.) since i've ad

Manifest test failing

2004-03-16 Thread Michael Scott
languages/tcl/.cvsignore is the only .cvsignore in the MANIFEST and a fresh checkout is failing with t/src/manifest..ok 2/4# Failed test (t/src/manifest.t at line 51) # Missing files in CVS: # languages/tcl/.cvsignore I assume this means languages/tcl/.cvsignore should not be

Test failing!

2002-03-30 Thread Steve Fink
Test 7 of t/op/stacks.t is failing for me right now. It fails even when I back up to version 1.25 of stacks.c, and anything earlier doesn't compile (without backing up other files too). [I sent this out last night, but a word of advice: don't do development on your active mail server!]

Test failing (win32)

2002-01-02 Thread Sterin, Ilya
The array_test #44 within pmc.t is segfaulting. Ilya