On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 03:40:41PM -0700, Jim Cromie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I think this is open to interpretation, at least its not specifically
> excluded in
> http://www.petdance.com/random/tap.html#skipping_tests
Eeek, let's not refer to that any more.
http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 03:40:41PM -0700, Jim Cromie wrote:
> There is no skip_rest(), but skip_all() can do that job, with a tiny
> enhancement
I would really rather it be called skip_rest(). There's no reason to wedge
two different bits of functionality into one function.
There is no skip_rest(), but skip_all() can do that job, with a tiny
enhancement
sub skip_all {
-if (@_) {
- print STDOUT "1..0 # Skipped: @_\n";
+if ($test == 1) {
+ if (@_) {
+ print STDOUT "1..0 \# Skipped: @_\n";
+ } else {
+ print STDOUT "1..0\n"
