Re: TAI time

2000-08-23 Thread Alan Burlison
Mark-Jason Dominus wrote: > If we're going to standardize on a single time format for all > platforms, I wish we could choose a good format. Unix time runs out > in 2038. Not true. On 64 bit Unix platforms time_t is 64 bit. Alan Burlison

Re: TAI time

2000-08-21 Thread Russ Allbery
Dave Storrs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If we are going to use this, I'd like to see us standardize on the > highest-precision (i.e. attosecond) version. While it's not necessary > in any application that I can currently think of and will probably never > be necessary in 90% of Perl applicatio

Re: TAI time

2000-08-21 Thread Dave Storrs
If we are going to use this, I'd like to see us standardize on the highest-precision (i.e. attosecond) version. While it's not necessary in any application that I can currently think of and will probably never be necessary in 90% of Perl applications, when you need it, you need it, and if the cor

Re: TAI Time

2000-08-19 Thread Mark-Jason Dominus
I agree with Tim that it's a red herring that unix systems don't normally have access to a TAI source. The proposal under discussion is to use one time format for all platforms. So maybe there's a minor difficulty in converting unix time to TAI time; probably it's

Re: TAI time

2000-08-19 Thread Russ Allbery
Tim Jenness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think this is a bit of a red herring. Presuambly the time on your > computer depends on where you are synching from (if at all) - if you are > synching to a TAI time server then you are fine. In the worst case you > are synching

Re: TAI time

2000-08-18 Thread Tim Jenness
ed herring. Presuambly the time on your computer depends on where you are synching from (if at all) - if you are synching to a TAI time server then you are fine. In the worst case you are synching to the sys admins watch so the minor actual difference between UTC and TAI may be irrelevant in most

Re: TAI time

2000-08-18 Thread Russ Allbery
Mark-Jason Dominus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > TAI is an international time standard. It has a number of technical > advantages over UTC. One of these advantages is that it doesn't have > any silly truck with leap seconds. One point to be aware of with TAI, however, is that Unix system clock

Re: TAI time

2000-08-18 Thread David E. Wheeler
Mark-Jason Dominus wrote: > > TAI is an international time standard. It has a number of technical > advantages over UTC. One of these advantages is that it doesn't have > any silly truck with leap seconds. ... Why, this sounds perfect, Mr. D! When will you write the RFC? David

TAI time

2000-08-18 Thread Mark-Jason Dominus
TAI is an international time standard. It has a number of technical advantages over UTC. One of these advantages is that it doesn't have any silly truck with leap seconds. Dan Bernstein has defined a time format called TAI64 which is based on TAI. The format is very simple. TAI64 is almost c