Thank you Bruce,
This does indeed help. Like I mentioned to Joseph I have yet to test it
but because it's coming out of the SF Study group I imagine it works. ;)
I'll certainly make noise if it doesn't.
Appreciate the time given to a follow-up.
~Paul
On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 7:42 PM Bruce Gray
Thank you Joseph,
Your response along with Bruce's response (which I'll respond to
separately) I presume works.
My hopes of fitting this into a one liner are crushed! lol Nah, just
playing.
Thank you for taking the time to respond.
This certainly helps with my project.
~Paul
On Sun, Nov 8, 2
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 8:23 AM Paul Procacci wrote:
> >
> > So two example patterns are:
> >
> > [\\u0009\\u000A\\u000D\\u0020-\\u007E\\u0085\\u00A0-\\uD7FF\\uE000-\\uFFFD\\u1-\\u10]*
> > [\\p{L}\\p{Z}\\p{N}_.:\\/=+\\-@]*
> >
> > To note, the RE's themselves cannot be changed as they are
I think this kind of thing does what you're after:
use Inline::Perl5;
my $p5 = Inline::Perl5.new;
my $p5pat = '\w+';
$p5.run( 'sub chk { $_[0] =~ m/' ~ $p5pat ~ '/ }' );
subset p5_words of Str where { $p5.call( "chk", $^a ) };
my p5_words $a = "alpha";
say $a; # alpha, perl5 word chars, so acce
Thank you Paul!
On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 8:57 AM Paul Procacci wrote:
>
> Hi Bill,
>
> Yes, that is exactly what I'm saying.
>
> https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/issues/2624
>
> " FWIW, the :P5 supports a Perl 5 like syntax from X versions ago (probably
> about 5.8, I would say)."
>
> The features
Hi Bill,
Yes, that is exactly what I'm saying.
https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/issues/2624
" FWIW, the :P5 supports a Perl 5 like syntax from X versions ago (probably
about 5.8, I would say)."
The features I need are in perl 5.10 which the :P5 adverb doesn't provide.
Thanks,
Paul
On Fri, Nov
Hi Paul,
I'm sorry, I don't understand.
Are you saying you're using Inline::Perl5 because you can't use the
"Perl compatibility adverb" :Perl5 or :P5 ?
https://docs.raku.org/language/regexes#Perl_compatibility_adverb
Is that what you mean when you say the "perl regex engine [in Raku] is
too old
So two example patterns are:
[\\u0009\\u000A\\u000D\\u0020-\\u007E\\u0085\\u00A0-\\uD7FF\\uE000-\\uFFFD\\u1-\\u10]*
[\\p{L}\\p{Z}\\p{N}_.:\\/=+\\-@]*
To note, the RE's themselves cannot be changed as they are fed externally.
Given that I'm stuck with these RE's which I believe are PCRE, I
I'm pretty sure you need to use single quotes for your example, as Raku
will replace the @_[0] before Perl has a chance to do anything with it.
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020, 10:23 PM Paul Procacci wrote:
> https://github.com/niner/Inline-Perl5
>
> use Inline::Perl5;
>
> subset test of Str where EVAL "sub
Can you provide some samples of what you are trying to match and
exclude? There might be alternative solutions.
https://github.com/niner/Inline-Perl5
use Inline::Perl5;
subset test of Str where EVAL "sub {@_[0] ~= m/\w+/}", :lang;
Question: Can you pass whatever {*} into eval for use in Inline::Perl5 a
la subset?
The above example is incomplete, I understand, however I'm looking to find
a method of cons
11 matches
Mail list logo
