Re: Sub::Uplevel

2005-09-19 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 01:09:55PM +, Smylers wrote: > Sounds like a cunning plan by the Sub::Uplevel author to get you to add > that module as a prereq for all yours, thereby increasing his kwalitee. I have no idea what you're talking about. [adjusts monocle, strokes white

Re: Sub::Uplevel

2005-09-10 Thread Smylers
Ovid writes: > Guess what the following modules all have in common (aside from the > fact that I wrote them)? > > AI::NeuralNet::Simple > AI::Prolog > Games::Maze::FirstPerson > > All of them have failed at one time or another because the target > comput

Re: Sub::Uplevel

2005-09-09 Thread Adrian Howard
oks at the "requires" parameter. So you'll get unexpected failures for those using CPANPLUS and defaulting to Build.PL. [snip] Although CPANPLUS should support build_requires - the mistake this time was mine since Sub::Uplevel should have been in requires to start with. Adrian

Re: Sub::Uplevel

2005-09-09 Thread David Golden
#x27;ll get unexpected failures for those using CPANPLUS and defaulting to Build.PL. Test::Exception 0.21 moves Sub::Uplevel from build_requires to requires. Hopefully, the recent and unexpected transition of responsibility for CPANPLUS::Dist::Build to the Module::Build team will lead to a fix fo

Sub::Uplevel

2005-09-09 Thread Ovid
Hi all, Guess what the following modules all have in common (aside from the fact that I wrote them)? AI::NeuralNet::Simple AI::Prolog Games::Maze::FirstPerson All of them have failed at one time or another because the target computer didn't have Sub::Uplevel installed. I'm goi