Re: Still More Startup Optimizations

On Sun, 3 Jun 2007 09:57:25 -0700 chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 03 June 2007 05:39:01 James E Keenan wrote: > > > chromatic wrote: > > > > If you're using a modern GNU ld, remove the shared library and > > > add a few more flags to LINK_DYNAMIC in Makefile. Here's mine: > > >

Re: Still More Startup Optimizations

On Sunday 03 June 2007 05:39:01 James E Keenan wrote: > chromatic wrote: > > If you're using a modern GNU ld, remove the shared library and add a few > > more flags to LINK_DYNAMIC in Makefile. Here's mine: > > > > LINK_DYNAMIC = > > -Wl,-E,-O1,-zdynsort,-hashvals,--hash-style=gnu,-zcombrel

Re: Still More Startup Optimizations

chromatic wrote: If you're using a modern GNU ld, remove the shared library and add a few more flags to LINK_DYNAMIC in Makefile. Here's mine: LINK_DYNAMIC = -Wl,-E,-O1,-zdynsort,-hashvals,--hash-style=gnu,-zcombreloc Do you have to edit the Makefile for this, or can you set it wi

Still More Startup Optimizations

If you're using a modern GNU ld, remove the shared library and add a few more flags to LINK_DYNAMIC in Makefile. Here's mine: LINK_DYNAMIC = -Wl,-E,-O1,-zdynsort,-hashvals,--hash-style=gnu,-zcombreloc These options seem to speed up the test suite for me by 10 - 15%. I'm curious to s