Re: Status of PXS and some IMHO obsolete ops

2003-02-23 Thread Leopold Toetsch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Leo / Dan -- Have we allocated PASM or IMC directives to replace the setline, setfile, and setpackage ops? * .file * .line [] * .package Should we have an indicator of the name of a sub, too? We don't need .file/.line, imcc knows these, and passes the inf

Re: Status of PXS and some IMHO obsolete ops

2003-02-23 Thread gregor
:35 AM To: P6I <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Status of PXS and some IMHO obsolete ops As stated in the thread "pxs help", the QT example can be expressed in terms of NCI. So IMHO the following opsen are

Status of PXS and some IMHO obsolete ops

2003-02-23 Thread Leopold Toetsch
As stated in the thread "pxs help", the QT example can be expressed in terms of NCI. So IMHO the following opsen are obsolete: - loadext (unused) - callnative (only in QtHelloWorld.pasm, unimplemented) And further: - setline - setfile - setpackage which are already/ought to be in the PBC metadata