--- Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I saw that one too with some files. Some bug lurking
> around related to line numbers. You could copy the
PASM
> source file and remove empty lines and comments.
>
> leo
I didn't have a chance to play with parrot at all this
week. Tonight, I decid
Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x00522808 in Parrot_jit_debug_stabs
> (interpreter=0x100d1d80) at src/jit_debug.c:348
> 348 fprintf(stabs, ".stabn " N_SLINE
> ",0,%d,%d /* %s */\n", line,
I saw that one too with s
--- Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good. So you can step through the JIT code.
>
Yes and no. On Monday, arithmetics_26 was not
coredumping parrot under JIT that I can remember. It
is now, but I am able to debug/trace with JIT. I am
not sure what to do since comparing the trace to
Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> parrot trans_9.pasm
> ok 1
> ok 2
> parrot -j trans_9.pasm
> ok 1
> not ok 2
[ ... ]
> (gdb) add-symbol-file arithmetics_26.o 0
> add symbol table from file "arithmetics_26.o" at
> .text_addr = 0x0
> (y or n) y
> Reading symbols from arithmetic
--- Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ... This is
> > the result of running 'make testj'.
>
> > Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List
> of
> > Failed
> >
>
--
> > t/
Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... This is
> the result of running 'make testj'.
> Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of
> Failed
> --
> t/op/trans.t6 1536196 31.58% 9-12 17-18
Strange. Can
Now that I have used a bit of trickery to ensure that
I have the absolute latest CVS checkout, things are
working again (make test passes all tests).
Previously I had only been verifying that -j was
working by trying a handful of the examples. This is
the result of running 'make testj'.
Failed T
