On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Juergen Boemmels wrote:
> I like the basic idea of having different random number
> generators. But having only the integer valued level seems a little
> bit problematic to me. Its not easy extendable if you have some
> special needs on the random number generator.
>
> So I pr
Matt Fowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> All~
>
> We could try to keep the opcode count down by simply having a seed
> opcode and an opcode to produce n random bytes... Anyone who wants
> more specific ranges could do the modulus and addition themselves.
The modulus/addition trick is very comm
All~
We could try to keep the opcode count down by simply having a seed
opcode and an opcode to produce n random bytes... Anyone who wants more
specific ranges could do the modulus and addition themselves.
Matt
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Almost forgotten about that, but I've checked in some days
Almost forgotten about that, but I've checked in some days ago the base
of Hash randomization, which is basically most of a ?rand48 library.
I don't know if its useful or practically usable with HLL code
generation but I've added to these randon function interface a
how_random parameter, which
