Re: Register move is in and done

2003-06-15 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 4:56 PM +0200 6/15/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... The non-JIT version compiles and builds just fine (including IMCC) but the JIT version does throw some errors. This isn't unexpected, unfortunately. (Sorry 'bout the extra work on the JIT, guys) JIT/i38

Re: Register move is in and done

2003-06-15 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... The non-JIT version compiles and builds just > fine (including IMCC) but the JIT version does throw some errors. > This isn't unexpected, unfortunately. (Sorry 'bout the extra work on > the JIT, guys) JIT/i386 is working fine. leo

Register move is in and done

2003-06-14 Thread Dan Sugalski
And I fully expect to get a few monster commit messages when this is all done. Anyway, I've moved the registers out of the context struct, and to the front of the interpreter struct, which is where they were anyway, just indirectly. The non-JIT version compiles and builds just fine (including I