On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 09:54:36AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> It would be very useful if tinderboxen could be revived.
>
> Thanks,
> leo
>
Until something better comes along I have installed tinderbox2
on a uml machine I have. Feel free to point any available tinderclients
at it.
URL - http://
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 09:54:36AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> It would be very useful if tinderboxen could be revived.
>
> Thanks,
> leo
>
Do we need a separate tinderbox, or do you think it might be helpful to
integrate parrot somehow into the current perl smoke reporting process?
There
does anyone know what happend with http://tinderbox.perl.org?
It is offline for quite some time now :-(
It died as part of the meltdown of onion a while back. It's on the list
'o things to get back, but it hasn't gotten there yet. I'll go nudge and
see what's up.
Last I checked, Zach was busy wi
At 12:01 AM +0200 10/10/04, Jens Rieks wrote:
Hi,
does anyone know what happend with http://tinderbox.perl.org?
It is offline for quite some time now :-(
It died as part of the meltdown of onion a while back. It's on the
list 'o things to get back, but it hasn't gotten there yet. I'll go
nudge an
> >about to cvs checkout parrot:
> >/home/perlcvs: no such repository
>
> Ah, that's finally gone away. The repository path is /cvs/publoc.
> What you're using's very old, though there was a temporary symlink in
> for a while.
It's been gone for months and months.
And you mean /cvs/public.
At 4:31 PM -0500 3/30/04, Abhijit A. Mahabal wrote:
Tinderbox "aniani" is not working with the latest copy. I checked the
other boxes and they seem fine.
Part of the log:
==
about to cvs checkout parrot:
/home/perlcvs: no such repository
Ah, that's finally gone away. The re
The scripts were written by Zach Lipton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and I believe he is still
maintaining things.
-J
--
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Josh Wilmes wrote:
>
> I'm not sure who owns the TD scripts, but I'd be willing to try to get
> them working again if someone could point me at them (and how to
I'm not sure who owns the TD scripts, but I'd be willing to try to get
them working again if someone could point me at them (and how to get the
appropriate accounts, etc)
--Josh
At 14:29 on 03/10/2003 PST, Ask Bjoern Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The tinderbox is all in flames.
>
>
> Slightly related, I think we could use some more tinderbox testers.
> Someone was running the tests on Compaq's test drive boxes, but that
> seems to have stopped?
I've restarted my Sparc/Solaris 8 tinderbox. Defining a list of needed test platforms
might be a good idea. I have plenty of old
[grr, reply all works better]
I'm not sure exactly what the cause of this is, but apache seems to be
"getting stuck." I rebooted it and it seems to be working fine now, but I'll
try to see if I can fix this permanently.
Zach
On 2/8/03 6:27 AM, "Leopold Toetsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Leop
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Again same problem:
Proxy Error
The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server.
The proxy server could not handle the request GET
/tinderbox/bdshowbuild.cgi.
Reason: Could not connect to remote machine: Operation timed out
Apache/1.3.26 Server at
> Strange. I can ssh in, and apachectl claims that the webserver is running,
> but I'm getting that error too.
>
> Ask, Robert: any ideas?
Looks like the apache had hung somewhere. I shut it down and started
it up, and it seems ok.
-R
Strange. I can ssh in, and apachectl claims that the webserver is running,
but I'm getting that error too.
Ask, Robert: any ideas?
Zach
On 1/31/03 4:09 AM, "Leopold Toetsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Proxy Error
> The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server.
>
> Th
At 4:40 PM +0100 1/21/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Seems to be some missing dependency. 'make realclean' should do it.
jit_cpu.c:603: structure has no member named `number'
That's mine--I'll go get it cleaned up. I'm not sure it'll help that
much, as I'm seeing multiply-defined symbol issues at
At 7:55 PM -0800 12/8/02, Steve Fink wrote:
I've gotten tired of endlessly clicking on tinderbox links to try to
figure out what's generally going wrong, so I made my computer do it
for me. Yes, I should have just made a script that runs on the
tinderbox machine or something instead of parsing Dat
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 07:55:01PM -0800, Steve Fink wrote:
> glastig, drinky-drinky, and one of the frivolous configurations (?)
> need to have their checkouts blown away, or just have their
> parrot/languages/CVS/Entries file edited to delete the D/brainfuck
> line.
For good measure, I wiped
On Dec-09, Josh Wilmes wrote:
>
> At 19:55 on 12/08/2002 PST, Steve Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > You can see the results here: http://foxglove.dnsalias.org/parrot/
>
> I'm getting a 404 on that.
Well, of course you would! Don't you know anything about the web? You
should have figured o
At 19:55 on 12/08/2002 PST, Steve Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can see the results here: http://foxglove.dnsalias.org/parrot/
I'm getting a 404 on that.
--Josh
Simon Glover wrote:
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Steve Fink wrote:
t/op/lexicals.t 6 1536 66 100.00% 1-6
t/pmc/multiarra 2 512 32 66.67% 2-3
t/pmc/scratchpa 3 768 33 100.00% 1-3
I can get these
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 11:59:36AM -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> While compiling, I did get the warnings:
>
> "cpu_dep.c", line 24: warning: initializer does not fit or is out of
> range: 0x91d02003
> "cpu_dep.c", line 26: warning: initializer does not fit or is out of
> range: 0x81c3e008
That
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 9:53 AM -0500 11/21/02, Jason Gloudon wrote:
> >On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 08:34:04AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> >
> >My patch in 16237 has the code to flush register windows on v8 and
> >older and v9
> >(64-bit) SPARC systems, which is what one is
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 10:28:42AM -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> > +#ifdef HAS_HEADER_SETJMP
> > +jmp_buf env;
> > +
> > +/* this should put registers in env, which then get marked in
> > + * trace_system_stack below
> > + */
> > +setjmp(env);
> > +#endif
>
> Alas, no, though
At 9:53 AM -0500 11/21/02, Jason Gloudon wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 08:34:04AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
My patch in 16237 has the code to flush register windows on v8 and
older and v9
(64-bit) SPARC systems, which is what one is really trying to achieve via
setjmp.
If this hasn't been
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> > A bit more ... In particular, on Solaris, I've been able to track down
> > one way of triggering the the t/op/lexicals.t failure to list.c. If I
> > compile list.c without any optimization, the test passes. If I compile
> > just the list_new functi
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 08:34:04AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
My patch in 16237 has the code to flush register windows on v8 and older and v9
(64-bit) SPARC systems, which is what one is really trying to achieve via
setjmp.
--
Jason
Andy Dougherty wrote:
A bit more ... In particular, on Solaris, I've been able to track down
one way of triggering the the t/op/lexicals.t failure to list.c. If I
compile list.c without any optimization, the test passes. If I compile
just the list_new function in list.c with the lowest optimiz
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Blair Christensen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 09:33:10PM -0800, Steve Fink wrote:
> > ### frivolous (Solaris 9 on Sparc; gcc-3.1) ###
> >
> > Looks like it crashed in the hashtable test. Why???
> >
> > Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
> >
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 09:33:10PM -0800, Steve Fink wrote:
> ### frivolous (Solaris 9 on Sparc; gcc-3.1) ###
>
> Looks like it crashed in the hashtable test. Why???
>
> Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
> --
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Simon Glover wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Steve Fink wrote:
> >
> > t/op/lexicals.t 6 1536 66 100.00% 1-6
> > t/pmc/multiarra 2 512 32 66.67% 2-3
> > t/pmc/scratchpa 3 768 3
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Steve Fink wrote:
>
> t/op/lexicals.t 6 1536 66 100.00% 1-6
> t/pmc/multiarra 2 512 32 66.67% 2-3
> t/pmc/scratchpa 3 768 33 100.00% 1-3
I can get these to fail on Li
Steve Fink wrote:
Looks like somebody gave the TD-* machines the correct input. Yay! We
can actually see some green again!
t/op/interp.t 1 256 21 50.00% 2
unimp restart on PPC
t/op/lexicals.t6 1536 66 100.00% 1-6
t/pmc/scratchpad.t
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve Fink) wrote:
[snip]
> ### glastig (Mac OS X 10.1) ###
>
> I've seen this message before, but I thought it was fixed now:
> "find_type returned 0 for illegal wanted -68". The next failure is
> similar: "Sub PMCs should be type 17 but have i
At 21:33 on 11/19/2002 PST, Steve Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ### galactic-lcc (Debian x86, lcc 4.1) ###
>
> Failed the "mod_n" test in number.t, and the "pushn & popn (deep)"
> test in stacks.t.
Not sure what the story is with pushn/popn, but the mod_n failure is normal
for lcc- it appear
At 9:33 PM -0800 11/19/02, Steve Fink wrote:
### glastig (Mac OS X 10.1) ###
I've seen this message before, but I thought it was fixed now:
"find_type returned 0 for illegal wanted -68". The next failure is
similar: "Sub PMCs should be type 17 but have incorrect type 16".
That's a test I added wh
Here's a message I got from a nice admin at HP.
--
Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 14:53:34 -0400
From: James Chamberlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:
Jeff wrote:
>
> Mike Lambert wrote:
> >
> > > First, a thank you to whoever it is who is running these test-drive
> > > machines (there's no name in the build log). Also, a thanks to Compaq
> > > for setting them up.
>
> Yes, many thanks to Compaq.
>
> > Yes, I had noticed that. And that struc
Mike Lambert wrote:
>
> > First, a thank you to whoever it is who is running these test-drive
> > machines (there's no name in the build log). Also, a thanks to Compaq
> > for setting them up.
Yes, many thanks to Compaq.
> Yes, I had noticed that. And that struct me as strange, particularly
T
> First, a thank you to whoever it is who is running these test-drive
> machines (there's no name in the build log). Also, a thanks to Compaq
> for setting them up.
You're welcome. It's basically just a script on my linux box that uploads
a tar file (the servers don't have gzip dammit! ;) to the
Andy Dougherty wrote:
>
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Andy Dougherty wrote:
>
> > Ok, with the alignment hack now in (see resources.c) and lots of various
> > and sundry portability fixes, it looks like we're on our way to turning
> > the tinderbox a lovely shade of green.
>
> AARGH! It appears I spok
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 07:37:48PM -0700, Steve Fink wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 09:32:27PM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, with the alignment hack now in (see resources.c) and lots of various
> > > and sundry portability fixes, it loo
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 09:32:27PM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Andy Dougherty wrote:
>
> > Ok, with the alignment hack now in (see resources.c) and lots of various
> > and sundry portability fixes, it looks like we're on our way to turning
> > the tinderbox a lovely shade o
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> Ok, with the alignment hack now in (see resources.c) and lots of various
> and sundry portability fixes, it looks like we're on our way to turning
> the tinderbox a lovely shade of green.
AARGH! It appears I spoke too soon. I don't have easy access t
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> Ok, with the alignment hack now in (see resources.c) and lots of various
> and sundry portability fixes, it looks like we're on our way to turning
> the tinderbox a lovely shade of green. (The solaris failures are timeouts
> unrelated to parrot, and th
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
> Would anyone get terribly upset if I nuked say everything older than
> a month?
Too late now. :-) When it's done deleting then log lookups should
be a lot faster.
Robert said he'd work on a new tinderbox system (with help from
Zach).
- ask
--
I just committed the fix for that Dan, disregard.
-Melvin
>Checking some things by compiling and running another small C program (this
>could take a while):
>
> Building ./testparrotsizes.cfrom testparrotsizes_c.in...
>In file included from include/parrot/string.h:18,
>
It is still using sendmail though I am working on a Net::SMTP version for
the next release. If you can give me a few days I'll have it up on CPAN.
Thanks for volunteering to contribute.
Zach
On 1/23/02 7:15 PM, "Melvin Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> different colors mean. There are als
>different colors mean. There are also no clients for windows or other rare
>OS's now. It would be great if we could get one going. I'll do the best that
>I can to help get it setup.
I remember trying a month or so ago and it appeared that the Tinderbox
module used sendmail wrapper for sending t
At 04:26 PM 1/11/2002 -0800, Jesse wrote:
>With current cvs, I get the following running Configure.pl--
>
> Building ./testparrotsizes.cfrom testparrotsizes_c.in...
>In file included from include/parrot/parrot.h:75,
> from testparrotsizes.c:9:
>include/parrot/string.
48 matches
Mail list logo
