Re: testing darcs with Perl (was: Re: testing non-modules)

2005-03-08 Thread Mark Stosberg
On 2005-03-08, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 11:33:30AM -0500, Mark Stosberg wrote: >> > I'd make life simpler and dump the shell scripts, see the note about >> > cross-platform compatibility below. >> >> The philosophy behind allowing both is to have a low

Re: testing darcs with Perl (was: Re: testing non-modules)

2005-03-08 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 11:33:30AM -0500, Mark Stosberg wrote: > > I'd make life simpler and dump the shell scripts, see the note about > > cross-platform compatibility below. > > The philosophy behind allowing both is to have a low barrier to entry > for people submitting tests. Better to have te

Re: testing darcs with Perl (was: Re: testing non-modules)

2005-03-08 Thread Mark Stosberg
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 08:23:31AM -0800, Michael G Schwern wrote: > > perl -MTest::Harness -e 'runtests @ARGV' tests/*.pl Aha. Thanks. > Why would you distribute a private copy of Test::Harness? To use 'prove', which your example above illustrates I don't need. > Or do you mean you

Re: testing darcs with Perl (was: Re: testing non-modules)

2005-03-08 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 03:31:37PM +, Mark Stosberg wrote: > Right now the tests are run one at a time, losing the benefit > of the summary report. > > I got stuck trying to think of how to best make this work. > > I don't think I want to use 'Makefile.PL', because the project already > has