Re: string_to_cstring()

2003-09-22 Thread Juergen Boemmels
"Gregor N. Purdy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Nicholas -- > > I'd be happy with that... [...] > > Instead could we just ditch the C-style put? (and make the layer table > > one pointer smaller) Thats something I wanted to do, See [RfC] Cleanup of ParrotIOLayerAPI I just wanted to let the rel

Re: string_to_cstring()

2003-09-21 Thread Gregor N. Purdy
Nicholas -- I'd be happy with that... Regards, -- Gregor On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 09:12, Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 08:48:55AM -0700, Gregor N. Purdy wrote: > > The next change is a change to the IO layer. In include/parrot/io.h > > we change struct _ParrotIOLayerAPI to have

Re: string_to_cstring()

2003-09-21 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 08:48:55AM -0700, Gregor N. Purdy wrote: > The next change is a change to the IO layer. In include/parrot/io.h > we change struct _ParrotIOLayerAPI to have two versions of C string > writing: > > INTVAL (*PutSc)(theINTERP, ParrotIOLayer * l, /* C-style string put > */ >