On Jul 20, 2005, at 21:35, Nicholas Clark wrote:
For now c&p helps :-)
I don't agree. c&p is evil, because it causes code bloat and
propagates bugs.
And I'm not after parameterising the aggregates - I'd like to
instantiate
another instance of what is currently a singleton, for the same ty
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 06:14:52PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Nicholas Clark wrote:
>
> >I'd like to be able to provide this as a non-singleton PMC class, with the
> >addition of a value lookup, and (possibly) iteration. But cut and paste is
> >evil.
>
> Well, the more general question is:
Nicholas Clark wrote:
I'd like to be able to provide this as a non-singleton PMC class, with the
addition of a value lookup, and (possibly) iteration. But cut and paste is
evil.
Well, the more general question is: how can we parameterize our
aggregates. We already have tons of arrays with (b
