At 11:05 PM +0300 8/4/03, Vladimir Lipskiy wrote:
I don't think I was reading pdd03_calling_conventions.pod
in a slipshod manner and I swear that this place in the pod
=item I1
The number of items pushed onto the parameter list.
is the personification of confusion.
Then I'll go clarify that. :)
-
I don't think I was reading pdd03_calling_conventions.pod
in a slipshod manner and I swear that this place in the pod
>=item I1
>
>The number of items pushed onto the parameter list.
is the personification of confusion.
> I1 ... Number of items in the overflow/parameter array P3.
Hell yeah. Tha
Vladimir Lipskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > foo($var1, $var2, $var3, ... , $var23);
>>
>> I would expect I2=11, I1=12
> D'oh, I suspected it should be I2=11, I1=23.
No. You have the first 11 parameters in P5..P15 (I2=11). Then you have 12
more, which go into the overflow array P3 (I1=12)
>
At 4:23 AM +0300 8/4/03, Vladimir Lipskiy wrote:
Q1: Suppose I have the following call into a sub named "foo":
foo($var1, $var2, $var3);
What should I set in I1? Is it 3?
Nope. I2 should be 3, and I1 0. (Assuming you put those three
parameters in the first three PMC registers, which is what you
> First of all, are you targeting PASM or PIR? For the latter, its done
> automatically.
I mean PASM
> > Q2: I'm calling without prototyping
>
> > foo($var1, $var2, $var3, ... , $var23);
>
> > Here, what should I place in I2? Is it 11 (as we have P5-P15) or
> > 23 (considering the P3 register)
Vladimir Lipskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Q1: Suppose I have the following call into a sub named "foo":
First of all, are you targeting PASM or PIR? For the latter, its done
automatically.
> foo($var1, $var2, $var3);
> foo($var1, @arr2, %hash3);
> Is it still 3, since these aren't gonna be f
