On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 09:24:26PM -0700, Steve Fink wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 12:00:31AM -0400, David Hand wrote:
> >
> > Index: hints/darwin.pl
> > ===
> > RCS file: /home/perlcvs/parrot/hints/darwin.pl,v
> > retrieving revi
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 12:00:31AM -0400, David Hand wrote:
>
> Index: hints/darwin.pl
> ===
> RCS file: /home/perlcvs/parrot/hints/darwin.pl,v
> retrieving revision 1.4
> diff -u -r1.4 darwin.pl
> --- hints/darwin.pl 8 Feb 2002
I think that I have perhaps discovered the solution to my inability to
compile parrot after 0.0.4.
It turns out that many (all?) things were compiling. I got a parrot.o,
for example. So none of the suspected problems with long long or cgoto
are now suspect. I was, for some reason, failing to l
Mike Lambert wrote:
>
> > Okay, that's bizarre. I'm going to try and track this down and see
> > what I can do about that.
>
> Before you get too far deep in it, I think David identified the problem in
> a later email. Basically, he has gcc 2.95 for Mac OS X. Unfortunatel,y, it
> doesn't seem to
Mike Lambert:
> check if they correctly support cgoto, and disable it if they don't. Given
> his Configure.pl output, his compiler is failing to compile
> testcomputedgoto.c, but yet it is still choosing to use the CGoto core
> when compiling Parrot.
This doesn't explain my test failures, though.
> Okay, that's bizarre. I'm going to try and track this down and see
> what I can do about that.
Before you get too far deep in it, I think David identified the problem in
a later email. Basically, he has gcc 2.95 for Mac OS X. Unfortunatel,y, it
doesn't seem to support computed goto. The Configu
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 02:40:16PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 2:10 PM -0400 4/17/02, David Hand wrote:
> >Trying CVS parrot as of 1400 EDT (why not?), it still didn't work.
> >Interestingly, typing "long" both times that Configure suggests "long
> >long" doesn't work, either. (I get what app
At 2:10 PM -0400 4/17/02, David Hand wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 01:40:39PM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
>> On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Andy Dougherty wrote:
>> > If I had to guess, I'd guess this was the problem. This is probably not
>> > as heavily-tested a Configuration as the plain 'long' ver
Okay, on a whim, I tried `perl Configure.pl` again in both my
parrot-0.0.4 and parrot-0.0.5 directories, accepting all defaults.
The difference appears to be in the checking for computed goto. Of
course, Configure.pl *does* warn me that I may see some errors.
I have no idea why any of this woul
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 01:40:39PM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> > If I had to guess, I'd guess this was the problem. This is probably not
> > as heavily-tested a Configuration as the plain 'long' version, and most of
> > that has probably been on lit
Simon Cozens:
> Just as a data point, CVS Parrot makes test fine under the same circumstances.
Guh, spoke too soon:
t/pmc/array.t 1 256 11 100.00% 1
t/pmc/perlstrin 1 256 81 12.50% 7
t/pmc/pmc.t 5 1280565 8.93% 49-53
--
I am familiar with this par
David Hand:
> Mind you that this is Mac OS X 10.1.3, with a UFS root partition.
Just as a data point, CVS Parrot makes test fine under the same circumstances.
> Hmm, I see your chosen INTVAL isn't the same size as your pointers. Parrot should
> still compile and run, but you may see a ton of w
David Hand:
# Okay, I can't find any documentation on how to send problem
# reports, so I hope this is sufficient and useful. If not,
# let me know:
#
# I've included the scrollback from `perl Configure.pl`, and
# the first pageful or so from `make`. (`make test`, of
# course, bombs complet
13 matches
Mail list logo
