Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 8:48 PM +0200 8/4/03, Valery A.Khamenya wrote:
>>Hi All,
>>
>> are there any info on getting ready-to-try
>> Parrot for win32 as stand-alone distribution?
>
> Not that I know of. If someone's got a working build and can put
> together a tarball or
Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What needs to go into the ZIP? My guesses are:-
> - parrot executable
> - imcc executable
These 2 executables are the same.
> - The docs directory
> - The examples directory
> - The languages directory
And Tests.
Anyway, MANI
> At 8:48 PM +0200 8/4/03, Valery A.Khamenya wrote:
> >Hi All,
> >
> > are there any info on getting ready-to-try
> > Parrot for win32 as stand-alone distribution?
>
> Not that I know of. If someone's got a working build and can put
> together a tarball or zip file, we can get it up for downloa
"Jonathan Worthington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> work something out. :-) However, Brent said "If you mean
> precompiled binaries, not yet. Parrot is still under development,
> so we aren't shipping binaries.",
This doesn't make sense to me. People who don't like hacking C can
still use a pr
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Sugalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Valery A.Khamenya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 10:44 PM
Subject: Re: parrot, win32, stand-alone distribution, separate Parrot
mailli
Valery A.Khamenya:
> are there any info on getting ready-to-try
> Parrot for win32 as stand-alone distribution?
If you mean precompiled binaries, not yet. Parrot is still under
development, so we aren't shipping binaries.
> What about separate Parrot maillist?
> (I am really sorry, I am
At 8:48 PM +0200 8/4/03, Valery A.Khamenya wrote:
Hi All,
are there any info on getting ready-to-try
Parrot for win32 as stand-alone distribution?
Not that I know of. If someone's got a working build and can put
together a tarball or zip file, we can get it up for download.
What about sepa