On Dec 16, 2007 1:02 PM, Klaas-Jan Stol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 15, 2007 5:46 PM, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Klaas-Jan Stol wrote:
> > >
> > > First of all, I certainly agree with this POV (even though I myself
> > tend to
> > > put in details in stuff that i u
On Dec 16, 2007 1:10 PM, Paul Cochrane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > the .pod files from the source, imho. (does parrot have a "make docs"
> > target?)
>
> Yes, it's the "make html" target.
>
> Paul
thanks, I found that make docs works as well.
> the .pod files from the source, imho. (does parrot have a "make docs"
> target?)
Yes, it's the "make html" target.
Paul
On Dec 15, 2007 5:46 PM, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Klaas-Jan Stol wrote:
> >
> > First of all, I certainly agree with this POV (even though I myself tend
> to
> > put in details in stuff that i update, for instance PDD19. The thing is,
> I
> > don't have a better solution where t
Klaas-Jan Stol wrote:
First of all, I certainly agree with this POV (even though I myself tend to
put in details in stuff that i update, for instance PDD19. The thing is, I
don't have a better solution where to store these details. I could leave
them out, but then the info is lost except for peo
