On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Steve Fink wrote:
> Tom Christiansen wrote:
> >
> > As we sneak under the wire here, I'm hoping someone
> > has posted an RFC that alters the meaning of my/local.
> > It's very hard to explain as is. my is fine, but local
> > should be changed to something like "temporary" (
Tom Christiansen wrote:
>
> As we sneak under the wire here, I'm hoping someone
> has posted an RFC that alters the meaning of my/local.
> It's very hard to explain as is. my is fine, but local
> should be changed to something like "temporary" (yes, that
> is supposed to be annoying to type) or
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tom Christiansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 10:36 AM
Subject: Re: my and local
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 10:18:34AM +0100, Tom Christiansen wrote:
> > As we sneak under the wire
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 10:18:34AM +0100, Tom Christiansen wrote:
> As we sneak under the wire here, I'm hoping someone
> has posted an RFC that alters the meaning of my/local.
> It's very hard to explain as is. my is fine, but local
> should be changed to something like "temporary" (yes, that
>
