Re: mmd_dispatch_numval

2003-10-16 Thread Simon Glover
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Jeff Clites wrote: > On Oct 16, 2003, at 2:40 PM, Simon Glover wrote: > > > On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Dan Sugalski wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Simon Glover wrote: > >> > From mmd.pod: > >>> > >>> =item FLOATVAL mmd_dispatch_numval(interp, left, right, func_num)

Re: mmd_dispatch_numval

2003-10-16 Thread Jeff Clites
On Oct 16, 2003, at 2:40 PM, Simon Glover wrote: On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Dan Sugalski wrote: On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Simon Glover wrote: From mmd.pod: =item FLOATVAL mmd_dispatch_numval(interp, left, right, func_num) Like C, only it returns a FLOATVAL. Wouldn't it be more sensible to call th

Re: mmd_dispatch_numval

2003-10-16 Thread Simon Glover
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Dan Sugalski wrote: > On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Simon Glover wrote: > > > > > >From mmd.pod: > > > > =item FLOATVAL mmd_dispatch_numval(interp, left, right, func_num) > > > > Like C, only it returns a FLOATVAL. > > > > Wouldn't it be more sensible to call the function mmd

Re: mmd_dispatch_numval

2003-10-16 Thread Dan Sugalski
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Simon Glover wrote: > > >From mmd.pod: > > =item FLOATVAL mmd_dispatch_numval(interp, left, right, func_num) > > Like C, only it returns a FLOATVAL. > > Wouldn't it be more sensible to call the function mmd_dispatch_floatval ? Yep. The terminology's mixed in a number