Tony Olekshy wrote:
> Also, the stuff going on in perl6-language-errors assumes a core
> Exception class, for use by "use Fatal (:all)" or whatever. Since
> this is, I believe, the first case of a "built-in" Perl class, there
> may be implications.
>
> Yours, &c, Tony Olekshy
I believe you ar
> Nathan, as a first task, could you figure out a list of which existing
> RFCs belong on the -objects list?
Sure. I believe these of mine belong there:
RFC 49: Objects should have builtin stringifying STRING method
RFC 73: All Perl core functions should return objects
RFC 101: Handle
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 09:27:23PM -0700, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
> >LIST: perl6-language-objects
> >CHAIR: Nathan Wiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >MISSION:Develop RFCs related to objects and OO programming in
> >Perl, possibly
On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 09:27:23PM -0700, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
>LIST: perl6-language-objects
>CHAIR: Nathan Wiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>MISSION:Develop RFCs related to objects and OO programming in
>Perl, possibly rationalising existing RFCs where they
