On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> That's what I would have thought, but it seems that 12! is already testing
> recursive functions. Unless there's an objection, I'll just delete the
> 14! test.
Sure.
/s
On Fri, 13 Sep 2002, Sean O'Rourke wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Sep 2002, Andy Dougherty wrote:
>
> > This test tests for
> >
> > 12! = 479001600
> > 14! = 1278945280
> >
> > However, 14! is really 87178291200.
> >
> > Is the test deliberately trying to test for some 32-bit-specific
> > integer overflow
