On Feb-25, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Steve Fink wrote:
>
> >On Feb-23, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> >
> >I think I kind of have a grasp on what's going on, now. So I've
> >attached two possible patches.
>
>
> I'm currently on the imcc stuff and could have a more detailed look at
> both patches afte
Steve Fink wrote:
On Feb-23, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
I think I kind of have a grasp on what's going on, now. So I've
attached two possible patches.
I'm currently on the imcc stuff and could have a more detailed look at
both patches after. But I think, both have the same effect on generated
co
On Feb-22, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 10:20 AM -0800 2/20/03, Steve Fink wrote:
> >The invoke op is bothering me -- namely, it disturbs me that it
> >implicitly operates on P0. I know that P0 is the correct register to
> >use according to pdd03, but I dislike having it be implicit. The user
> >is req
On Feb-23, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
> Good.
> One minor note - and it is my fault to haven't documented that in the
> first place - I did revert all the other changes, they are necessary for
> pbc2c compiled code.
> Of course, it would be better, to have another set of macros, that
> state: "Thi
Steve Fink wrote:
On Feb-22, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Yep. At least add B.
Ok, done.
Good.
One minor note - and it is my fault to haven't documented that in the
first place - I did revert all the other changes, they are necessary for
pbc2c compiled code.
Of course, it would be better, to have
On Feb-22, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Steve Fink wrote:
>
> >So would anyone mind if I eliminated the zero-arg invoke op in favor
> >of a one-arg invoke that takes a single PMC? (I may also have
> >situations where I don't need to follow pdd03, and it would be more
> >convenient to use a different re
At 10:20 AM -0800 2/20/03, Steve Fink wrote:
The invoke op is bothering me -- namely, it disturbs me that it
implicitly operates on P0. I know that P0 is the correct register to
use according to pdd03, but I dislike having it be implicit. The user
is required to set the rest of the pdd03 convention
Steve Fink wrote:
The invoke op is bothering me -- namely, it disturbs me that it
implicitly operates on P0. I know that P0 is the correct register to
use according to pdd03, but I dislike having it be implicit. The user
is required to set the rest of the pdd03 conventions up manually, so I
don't
