Reini Urban wrote:
And I'm tempted to add: Actually even the 1984 version of lisps are
still technically and syntax-wise far advanced over the perl and
parrot state of today. I see not much of a progress.
Philosophically, I agree. In my usual Parrot architecture talk there's a
slide right at
2008/8/29 chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Friday 29 August 2008 10:04:44 Reini Urban wrote:
>> perl5 even lost undump around that time and the perl compiler was axed last
>> year.
>
> Economic realities often trump idealism. I'd like to see a working Perl 5
> compiler suite as well, but I don'
On Friday 29 August 2008 10:04:44 Reini Urban wrote:
> perl5 even lost undump around that time and the perl compiler was axed last
> year.
Economic realities often trump idealism. I'd like to see a working Perl 5
compiler suite as well, but I don't have the time to do it, and no one seems
to
