- Original Message -
From: "Cameron Laird" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 8:43 PM
Subject: Re: dLoo release
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 11
>13:35:23 2001
> .
> .
> .
> The lesson to be drawn is consistent with Dan sayings: it is an excellent way to
>spread a product as a browser or better as a
> plug-in but the security model must be thought ab initio.
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Sugalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Nathan Torkington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 6:59 PM
Subject: Re: dLoo releases peer-to-peer programm
At 10:16 AM 7/11/2001 -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
>nile writes, "Today, dLoo released the complete architecture of an
>extensible peer-to-peer programming language."
And I thought NFS was the security hole from hell...
Unless there's a lot of very clever (research-level, "Hi we're from IBM's
