Re: cvs commit: parrot exceptions.c interpreter.c misc.c spf_vtable.c

At 11:51 AM +0100 1/11/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Brent Dax wrote: Steve Fink: # -memcpy(targ, ret->strstart, ret->bufused); # -targ[ret->bufused + 1] = '\0'; # +memcpy(targ, ret->strstart, ret->strlen); # +targ[ret->strlen] = '\0'; I could be wrong, but isn't strlen the

Re: cvs commit: parrot exceptions.c interpreter.c misc.c spf_vtable.c

Steve Fink wrote: On Jan-11, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Brent Dax wrote: Steve Fink: # -memcpy(targ, ret->strstart, ret->bufused); # -targ[ret->bufused + 1] = '\0'; # +memcpy(targ, ret->strstart, ret->strlen); # +targ[ret->strlen] = '\0'; I could be wrong, but isn't strl

Re: cvs commit: parrot exceptions.c interpreter.c misc.c spf_vtable.c

On Jan-11, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > Brent Dax wrote: > > >Steve Fink: > ># -memcpy(targ, ret->strstart, ret->bufused); > ># -targ[ret->bufused + 1] = '\0'; > ># +memcpy(targ, ret->strstart, ret->strlen); > ># +targ[ret->strlen] = '\0'; > > > >I could be wrong, but isn't str

Re: cvs commit: parrot exceptions.c interpreter.c misc.c spf_vtable.c

Brent Dax wrote: Steve Fink: # -memcpy(targ, ret->strstart, ret->bufused); # -targ[ret->bufused + 1] = '\0'; # +memcpy(targ, ret->strstart, ret->strlen); # +targ[ret->strlen] = '\0'; I could be wrong, but isn't strlen the length in characters rather than the length in byt

RE: cvs commit: parrot exceptions.c interpreter.c misc.c spf_vtable.c

Steve Fink: # -memcpy(targ, ret->strstart, ret->bufused); # -targ[ret->bufused + 1] = '\0'; # +memcpy(targ, ret->strstart, ret->strlen); # +targ[ret->strlen] = '\0'; I could be wrong, but isn't strlen the length in characters rather than the length in bytes? --Brent Dax <[