Sam Ruby wrote:
Before this line is executed,
(gdb) p interpreter->ctx.bp
$1 = (struct parrot_regs_t *) 0x40b6bd88
After the above line is executed:
(gdb) p interpreter->ctx.bp
$2 = (struct parrot_regs_t *) 0x40b6bae8
Then is obviously your implementation of get_repr broken.
Two questions c
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
+inline op get_repr(out STR, in PMC) {
+STRING *s = $2->vtable->get_repr(interpreter, $2);
+$1 = s;
goto NEXT();
}
Strange. Stranger. Strangest. Did the test fail with JIT/i386 only?
I didn't mean to commit the "inline
Sam Ruby wrote:
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
+inline op get_repr(out STR, in PMC) {
+STRING *s = $2->vtable->get_repr(interpreter, $2);
+$1 = s;
goto NEXT();
}
Strange. Stranger. Strangest. Did the test fail with JIT/i386 only?
I didn't mean to commit the "inline" portion of the chan
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't understand this. At all. But the test case added to pyclass.t
(motivated by test 4 in pie/b3.t) only passes if this change to the
get_repr op is made.
[ ... ]
-op get_repr(out STR, in PMC) {
-$1 = $2->vtable->get_repr(int
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't understand this. At all. But the test case added to pyclass.t
> (motivated by test 4 in pie/b3.t) only passes if this change to the
> get_repr op is made.
[ ... ]
> -op get_repr(out STR, in PMC) {
> -$1 = $2->vtable->get_repr(interpret
