Re: async i/o

2003-07-03 Thread Uri Guttman
> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DS> At 6:17 PM -0400 7/3/03, Uri Guttman wrote: >> > "TB" == Tim Bunce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: TB> Has any other language learnt to swim well in these swamps? >> none that i have heard of can swim all swamps. we could be >>

Re: async i/o

2003-07-03 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 6:17 PM -0400 7/3/03, Uri Guttman wrote: > "TB" == Tim Bunce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: TB> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 05:10:23PM -0400, Uri Guttman wrote: >> > "AB" == Alan Burlison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> AB> Dan Sugalski wrote: >> >> The more I think about this the mo

Re: async i/o (was Re: This week's summary)

2003-07-03 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 11:02 PM +0100 7/3/03, Tim Bunce wrote: On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 05:10:23PM -0400, Uri Guttman wrote: > "AB" == Alan Burlison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: AB> Dan Sugalski wrote: >> The more I think about this the more I want to punt on the whole >> idea. Cross-platform async IO is

Re: async i/o

2003-07-03 Thread Uri Guttman
> "TB" == Tim Bunce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: TB> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 05:10:23PM -0400, Uri Guttman wrote: >> > "AB" == Alan Burlison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> AB> Dan Sugalski wrote: >> >> The more I think about this the more I want to punt on the whole >> >> idea.

Re: async i/o (was Re: This week's summary)

2003-07-03 Thread Tim Bunce
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 05:10:23PM -0400, Uri Guttman wrote: > > "AB" == Alan Burlison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > AB> Dan Sugalski wrote: > >> The more I think about this the more I want to punt on the whole > >> idea. Cross-platform async IO is just one big swamp. > > AB> Agreed

Re: async i/o (was Re: This week's summary)

2003-07-03 Thread Alan Burlison
Uri Guttman wrote: who here will be at oscon (or yapc::eu)? i would like to get a small BOF going on this subject. i agree it is a morass but i have some ideas and i know dan has plenty. but we had better learn to swim these swamps and not get eaten by the gators. we can drain them, convert them t

Re: async i/o (was Re: RFC 310 (v1) Ordered bytecode)

2000-09-27 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 04:24:05AM -0400, Uri Guttman wrote: > well, my question then is how does solaris do it? it can't be done with > user level libs alone. what system calls does it use? undocumented ones > perhaps with the libs as the public api? > i finally found how solaris does its AIO un

Re: async I/O (was Re: PERL6STORM - tchrist's brainstorm list for perl6)

2000-09-21 Thread Uri Guttman
> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DS> At 05:35 PM 9/21/00 -0400, Uri Guttman wrote: >> i proposed some of that in my rfc47 (universal async i/o). at the perl >> level you need a delivery interface as with events. DS> I'm not really worried about the perl level for th

Re: async I/O (was Re: PERL6STORM - tchrist's brainstorm list for perl6)

2000-09-21 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 05:35 PM 9/21/00 -0400, Uri Guttman wrote: > > "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > DS> I would *really* like perl's I/O system to do async reads and > DS> writes to disk files whenever possible. That'd let us get another > DS> burst of speed in some spots, particularl