In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(James Mastros) wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 01:38:58PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > Currently, I don't want to promise back before Win98, though if Win95
> > is no different from a programming standpoint (I have no idea if it
> > is) the
At 06:27 PM 11/4/2001 -0500, James Mastros wrote:
>On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 01:38:58PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > Currently, I don't want to promise back before Win98, though if Win95
> is no
> > different from a programming standpoint (I have no idea if it is) then
> > that's fine too. Win 3.
On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 01:38:58PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Currently, I don't want to promise back before Win98, though if Win95 is no
> different from a programming standpoint (I have no idea if it is) then
> that's fine too. Win 3.1 and DOS are *not* target platforms, though if
> someone
At 05:26 PM 11/4/2001 +, Richard J Cox wrote:
>This of course leads to the question of what is the earliest Win32 version
>that Perl6 will support?
Currently, I don't want to promise back before Win98, though if Win95 is no
different from a programming standpoint (I have no idea if it is) th
