That's okay - I've also considered and discarded Parrot. ;-)
Good luck with Parrot guys.
I will check out either Mono or Lua's VM for my purposes.
Thanks.
--- Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 2:34 PM -0800 12/27/03, Joe Wilson wrote:
> >I get consistantly much better timings when argu
At 2:34 PM -0800 12/27/03, Joe Wilson wrote:
I get consistantly much better timings when arguments of prototyped functions
(regardless of type, number of arguments, or whether it is a vararg function)
are simply all passed in a single PMC array unconditionally.
Please consider it.
Considered, but a
--- Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The overhead you're seeing comes from many things. First, using
> prototyped (or unprototyped) functions from in imcc follows the parrot
> calling conventions. That is, it uses continuation-passing instead of
> bsr, sets a few int registers on the run
Joe Wilson writes:
> Using a recursive version of the fibonacci function (with
> the integer 32 as an argument) to test function call overhead
> I get these timings for various languages and configurations:
>
> perl 5.6.1fib.pl 10.93 seconds
> python 2.2.2 fib.py6.76 seconds
>
