Ilya Martynov wrote:
There is a small typo in comment for second test case:
Thanks, fixed.
Plus another test and checks that I3 is really 11.
leo
Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> On Monday 22 March 2004 13:54, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>> And P3 := overflow_args ?
>> P0 := the_sub ??
>> P1 := return_continuation ?
>> S0 := method_name ?
> Sounds okay. Maybe its better to either alias return_continuation to the
> regis
> "LT" == Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
LT> Ilya Martynov wrote:
>> Prints 'P3 is not NULL'
LT> Yep, some minutes ago I've fixed it. Thanks for the test, I've added
LT> it plus another one to CVS.
There is a small typo in comment for second test case:
Index: imcc/t/syn/pcc.t
=
Hi,
On Monday 22 March 2004 13:54, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> First a note: P3 is now cleared, if P15 is reached. So havin 11 args can
> be distinguished from having more then 11 arguments.
>
> > Leo, is it easy to alias them as argc[ISPN]?
>
> Yes. It's the
> "JR" == Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JR> Hi,
JR> On Monday 22 March 2004 10:44, Ilya Martynov wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> 1) First question is how to tell if variadic function recieved 11 or
>> 12 or more params (for simplicity let's suppose that we use only
>> pmc parameters).
>>
> "LT" == Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
LT> Ilya Martynov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> 1) First question is how to tell if variadic function recieved 11 or
>> 12 or more params (for simplicity let's suppose that we use only
>> pmc parameters).
>> According callin
Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
First a note: P3 is now cleared, if P15 is reached. So havin 11 args can
be distinguished from having more then 11 arguments.
> Leo, is it easy to alias them as argc[ISPN]?
Yes. It's the same as aliasing C to P2. If we can agree on the
variable names, this i
Ilya Martynov wrote:
Prints 'P3 is not NULL'
Yep, some minutes ago I've fixed it. Thanks for the test, I've added it
plus another one to CVS.
leo
At 12:50 PM +0100 3/22/04, Jens Rieks wrote:
> ops/set.ops has setp_ind op which allows to write to register by its
number but it seems there is no op to read register by its number.
I had the same problem, too.
That needs fixing. If you want to throw together a patch, by all
means go for it.
--
Hi,
On Monday 22 March 2004 10:44, Ilya Martynov wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> 1) First question is how to tell if variadic function recieved 11 or
>12 or more params (for simplicity let's suppose that we use only
>pmc parameters).
>
> According calling conventions (pdd03) first 11 params end up
Ilya Martynov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
> 1) First question is how to tell if variadic function recieved 11 or
>12 or more params (for simplicity let's suppose that we use only
>pmc parameters).
> According calling conventions (pdd03) first 11 params end up in P5-P15
> regi
11 matches
Mail list logo
