Andy Lester wrote:
What about when you want to implement things like, element -1 gets the
last element of the array? That's the case in some languages, I
believe...
Yes, but we're talking about returning the number of elements in a PMC.
That should never be negative.
Unless someone wants
What about when you want to implement things like, element -1 gets
the last element of the array? That's the case in some languages, I
believe...
Yes, but we're talking about returning the number of elements in a
PMC. That should never be negative.
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED]
chromatic wrote:
On Friday 28 December 2007 07:09:24 Andy Lester wrote:
Should we be allowing negative in the PMC elements() functions? Seems
to me they'd be more appropriate as UINTVALs.
I can't think of any reason they could be negative. Can you make a patch to
convert them and s
On Dec 28, 2007, at 12:17 PM, chromatic wrote:
Should we be allowing negative in the PMC elements() functions?
Seems
to me they'd be more appropriate as UINTVALs.
I can't think of any reason they could be negative. Can you make a
patch to
convert them and see if anything breaks?
A
On Friday 28 December 2007 07:09:24 Andy Lester wrote:
> Should we be allowing negative in the PMC elements() functions? Seems
> to me they'd be more appropriate as UINTVALs.
I can't think of any reason they could be negative. Can you make a patch to
convert them and see if anything breaks?
-
